Monday, 13 October 2025

Better Start Literacy Approach (BSLA) - Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)

What is Oral Reading Fluency?

Oral reading fluency (ORF) is the ability to read a text aloud with a combination of accuracy, speed, and proper expression (prosody). It's a key indicator of a person's overall reading ability, as it demonstrates that they can decode words automatically, allowing their brain to focus on comprehending the meaning of the text.

Here are the core components:

  • Accuracy: Reading the words in a text correctly.

  • Speed (or Rate): Reading at a conversational pace, not too fast or too slow. This is often measured in Correct Words Per Minute (CWPM).

  • Prosody: Reading with natural expression, paying attention to punctuation, and using appropriate intonation and phrasing. It should sound like natural speech.


Evaluation of Your Data

The data you've provided gives a clear snapshot of the oral reading fluency for eight individuals. Here is a breakdown and evaluation of their performance.

For context, reading accuracy is often broken down into three levels:

  • ✅ Independent (95-100%): The reader can handle the text easily.

  • 🟑 Instructional (90-94%): The reader can manage the text with some guidance. This is the ideal level for teaching.

  • πŸ”΄ Frustration (<90%): The text is too difficult for the reader, leading to poor comprehension.


Here is the data organized by performance level:


Survey Names

ORF - Correct

ORF - Errors

Accuracy

Composite Score

Performance Level

Gra

83

1

99%

298

✅ Independent

Ang

107

5

96%

345

✅ Independent

Ame

65

2

97%

291

✅ Independent

Del

72

2

97%

294

✅ Independent

Sio

43

4

91%

283

🟑 Instructional

Joa

59

8

88%

305

πŸ”΄ Frustration

Cas

31

8

79%

282

πŸ”΄ Frustration

Sad

10

10

50%

265

πŸ”΄ Frustration

Export to Sheets


Key Observations and Analysis

High Performers (Independent Level)

These individuals can read the text with very few errors.

  • Ang: Is the fastest and most efficient reader, with 107 correct words and 96% accuracy. The high composite score of 345 also marks them as a top performer.

  • Gra, Ame, and Del: All show excellent accuracy (99% and 97%). They are reading comfortably and making minimal errors, which allows them to focus on what the text means.

🟑 Instructional Performer

This individual is in the ideal zone for learning with this text.

  • Sio: At 91% accuracy, Sio finds the text challenging but manageable with support. The 4 errors suggest specific areas where instruction could help improve their decoding skills.

πŸ”΄ Performers at a Frustration Level

These individuals found this text too difficult, which negatively impacts both fluency and comprehension.

  • Joa and Cas: With accuracy at 88% and 79%, respectively, they are making too many errors for this text to be productive for them. They would benefit from reading easier material to build foundational skills and confidence.

  • Sad: This reader is struggling significantly with this text. An accuracy of 50% (making one error for every word read correctly) is a clear sign that the material is far beyond their current reading level. They require immediate and intensive intervention with much simpler texts.

Summary

The data shows a wide range of reading abilities. Ang and Gra are excelling, while readers like Sad, Cas, and Joa require significant support. Identifying these levels is the critical first step in providing the right instruction for each person.

Better Start Literacy Approach (BSLA) - Orthographic Data


What is Orthography?

Simply put, orthography is the technical term for the spelling system of a language. It's the set of rules and patterns that govern how we use letters and letter combinations to represent sounds and words in writing.

Think of it as the brain's mental blueprint for words. When a child has strong orthographic knowledge, they can quickly and automatically recognize that "phone" starts with "ph" not "f," or that "night" contains the "igh" pattern. This skill is vital for both fluent reading and accurate spelling because it allows a reader to recognize words instantly instead of having to sound them out letter by letter.


What Your Data Tells You

This data gives you a clear picture of how your students' spelling knowledge impacts their reading skills. The "Orthographic Assessment" was scored out of 20.

1. Spelling Knowledge is Still Developing

No student has mastered this area, as the highest score is 14/20. This shows that all students are still learning the complex spelling patterns of English.

2. There's a Clear Link Between Spelling and Reading Accuracy

When you compare the orthographic scores to the reading accuracy, a strong pattern emerges:

  • High Orthographic Score = High Accuracy: Gra has the highest orthographic score (14/20) and also has the highest reading accuracy (99%). Her strong knowledge of spelling patterns means she can decode words correctly with very few errors.

  • Low Orthographic Score = Low Accuracy: Sad has a developing orthographic score (10/20) and the lowest reading accuracy in the group at 50%. He made 10 errors while reading only 20 words, which strongly suggests his difficulty with spelling patterns is causing him to misread a large number of words. Similarly, Cas has a score of 12/20 and a lower accuracy of 79%, making 8 errors.

3. Spelling Knowledge Drives Reading Fluency

Strong orthographic skills also lead to more fluent, automatic reading.

  • Ang is a perfect example. She has a strong orthographic score of 13/20 and the highest Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) score, reading 107 words correctly in one minute. Her brain can recognize words quickly, allowing her to read with speed and confidence.

  • In contrast, students with weaker orthographic scores like Sio (7/20) and Cas (12/20) have much lower fluency scores (43 and 31 words correct per minute, respectively). They are likely spending more mental energy trying to figure out individual words, which slows down their overall reading pace.

In summary, your data clearly shows that orthography is a foundational skill for literacy. The students with a better grasp of spelling patterns are reading more accurately and fluently. Those who struggle with orthography are finding it much harder to read the words on the page.


Some specific teaching strategies to support the students who have lower orthographic scores.


With the likes for  Sio, Ame, Joa, and Sad.

The goal of these activities is to move beyond rote memorization and help students see the patterns and logic within words. This builds their mental "filing system" for spelling, which in turn boosts their reading accuracy and fluency.


Strategy 1: Word Sorts

What it is: This is a hands-on activity where students sort a list of words into different categories based on their spelling patterns.

Why it works: It trains students to look for and recognize common letter patterns instead of seeing words as a random jumble of letters. It’s an active, analytical process that makes spelling patterns explicit.

How to do it:

  1. Choose a specific spelling pattern to focus on. For example, the different ways to make the long 'a' sound.

  2. Write words on small cards. Include words with the target patterns (rain, play, make) and some that don't fit (ran, map).

  3. Ask the student to read each card and sort them into columns based on the pattern (e.g., an 'ai' column, an 'ay' column, and an 'a_e' column).

  4. Discuss why they sorted the words the way they did. "What do you notice about all the words in this column?"

Example for Joa (Orthographic Score: 8): You could give him cards with words like boat, toe, snow, hope, and hot. He would sort them to discover the different 'oa', 'oe', 'ow', and 'o_e' patterns that make the long 'o' sound.


Strategy 2: Sound Boxes (Elkonin Boxes)

What it is: Students listen to a word and move a token into a box for each sound they hear. They then write the letter or letter combination that represents each sound in the boxes.

Why it works: This strategy directly connects the spoken sounds of a word (phonemes) to the letters that represent them (graphemes). It's a powerful way to build the phonics foundation needed for strong orthographic mapping.

How to do it:

  1. Draw a series of connected boxes, one for each sound in a word (e.g., the word "sheep" has 3 sounds, /sh/ /ee/ /p/, so it needs 3 boxes).

  2. Say the word "sheep" slowly.

  3. Have the student push a counter into a box for each sound they hear: /sh/ (one counter), /ee/ (second counter), /p/ (third counter).

  4. Finally, they write the corresponding letters in the boxes: sh in the first, ee in the second, and p in the third.

This would be excellent for Sio and Ame (Orthographic Score: 7) to reinforce the basic sound-symbol relationships they are struggling with.


Strategy 3: Word Building & Word Ladders

What it is: Using magnetic letters or tiles, students build a word and then change one letter at a time to create a new word.

Why it works: This activity forces students to pay close attention to the sequence of letters in a word. It demonstrates how changing just one letter can completely change the word, improving their visual memory for correct letter order.

How to do it:

  1. Start with a simple three-letter word, like cat.

  2. Ask the student to change one letter to turn cat into bat.

  3. Then, change one letter to turn bat into bit.

  4. Continue the chain: bit -> sit -> sip -> ship.

Example for Sad (Orthographic Score: 10): A word ladder could help him analyze words more carefully instead of guessing, which likely contributed to his 50% reading accuracy. Starting with simple CVC words and moving to words with blends and digraphs would be very beneficial.

Wednesday, 1 October 2025

Term 4 - Questionnaire Responses and Comparision with Term 1 Responses

 


Here is a comparison of the key trends from the Term 1 and Term 4 reading surveys.

(Note: As the files are presentations, the following comparison is based on the data and text content extracted from them.)

Overall Summary of Changes

Across the board, the comparison from Term 1 to Term 4 shows several positive developments in the learners' reading habits. Key trends include a significant improvement in attitudes towards reading, an increase in reading frequency, a broadening of reading interests, and a clear shift towards more reading independence.


Detailed Comparison by Question

1. How do you feel about reading?

  • Term 1: A larger portion of students reported feeling "Okay" or "Sad" about reading.

  • Term 4: The number of learners who feel "Happy" about reading saw a notable increase, while the number of "Sad" responses decreased.

  • Comparison: This change suggests a positive shift in learners' overall attitude and confidence in reading. Strategies to continue building this confidence often include creating a positive reading environment, using texts that match student interests, and offering frequent, genuine praise for effort.

2. How often do you read at home?

  • Term 1: A significant percentage of learners read "Sometimes" or "Never".

  • Term 4: There was a clear increase in the percentage of learners reporting that they read "Every day" and a corresponding decrease in those who "Never" read at home.

  • Comparison: This indicates a positive increase in reading frequency and engagement outside of school.

3. What types of books do you like?

  • Term 1: Fiction was the dominant preferred genre.

  • Term 4: While fiction remains popular, there was a visible increase in learners selecting "Non-Fiction" and "Comics".

  • Comparison: This demonstrates a healthy broadening of reading interests. Exposing students to a variety of genres is beneficial as it can build a wider vocabulary, enhance analytical skills, and foster greater cultural awareness and empathy. The growing interest in comics is also a positive sign; comics can be a powerful tool to motivate reluctant readers and build comprehension by providing strong visual context clues to support the text.

4. Who do you read with?

  • Term 1: A majority of learners reported reading with "Parents".

  • Term 4: The percentage of learners reading with "Parents" decreased, while the percentage for reading by "Myself" increased significantly.

  • Comparison: This change suggests a promising trend towards greater reading independence. As students begin to read more on their own, it's important to equip them with strong comprehension strategies, such as learning to make predictions, summarize what they've read, and ask questions to check their own understanding.

Thursday, 19 June 2025

Updated Reading Assessments (Term 2)



From the comparison between the Term 1 and Term 2 data in your tables, there is clear evidence of reading progress across most learners based on their Running Records and e-asTTle Reading Comprehension levels.

Here’s a summary of the progress:


πŸ“˜ Running Record Progress

Most learners made steady gains between Entry 1 (Term 1) and Entry 2 (Term 2):

  • Gra (Y4): Improved from Level 24 (2P) → Level 26 (2P)

  • Ame (Y4): Improved from Level 22 (2P) → Level 24 (2P)

  • Del (Y4): Improved from Level 22 (2B) → Level 26 (2P)

  • Sio (Y4): Improved from Level 10 (1B) → Level 14 (2B)

  • Cas (Y5): Improved from Level 18 (2B) → Level 20 (2P)

  • Joa (Y5): Improved from Level 22 (2B) → Level 24 (2B)

  • Sad (Y5): Improved from Level 5 (2B) → Level 9 (2P)

  • Ang (Y5): Maintained at Level 25 (2B → 2P)

✅ Overall: All learners showed movement forward in reading levels, with Sio and Sad showing the biggest jumps for their level range.


πŸ“— e-asTTle Reading Comprehension Progress

  • Gra: 2P → 2A (progressed within Level 2)

  • Ame: 2P → 2P (steady, maintained level)

  • Del: 2B → 2P (progressed one sub-level)

  • Sio: 1B → 2B (significant improvement)

  • Cas: 2B → 2P (one sub-level improvement)

  • Joa: 2B → 2B (steady)

  • Sad: 2B → 2P (one sub-level improvement)

  • Ang: 2B → 2P (one sub-level improvement)

✅ Overall: 6 out of 8 learners showed improvement in e-asTTle levels, and the other 2 maintained their progress.


πŸ“Š Summary

  • All eight learners made measurable progress in at least one assessment area.

  • Running Record gains indicate improved decoding and fluency.

  • e-asTTle gains suggest better comprehension and understanding.

  • Sio and Sad demonstrated the most noticeable growth, showing strong upward movement from very low initial levels.

Making Sense of eTAP Data

 Making Sense of eTAP Data: A Practical Guide to Effective Graphing Using data well is one of the most powerful tools a class teacher has. ...