Term 4 Assessment Data - PM Bench Mark

Term 4 Rebound: In Term 4, almost every student made significant progress, with many making substantial jumps in their reading levels, indicating a successful re-engagement or change in instruction.

📈 Student Progress Breakdown

Strong Rebound (T1-T4)

Despite the Term 3 stall, most students finished the year showing good to excellent progress from their starting point.

• Gra (Year 4): L 24 → L 26 → L 26 → L 30 (4A)

• Ame (Year 4): L 22 → L 24 → L 24 → L 30 (4A)

• Del (Year 4): L 22 → L 26 → L 26 → L 30 (4A)

• Sio (Year 4): L 10 → L 14 → L 14 → L 23 (3B)

• Cia (Year 5): L 18 → L 20 → L 20 → L 23 (3B)

• Jae (Year 5): L 22 → L 24 → L 24 → L 28 (4B)

• Sad (Year 5): L 5 → L 9 → L 9 → L 15 (3P)

These students all jumped multiple levels in Term 4, effectively overcoming the previous stall.

---

⚠️ Significant Concern

• Ang (Year 5): This student is the only one who did not rebound in Term 4.

• T1: L 25

• T2: L 25

• T3: L 25

• T4: L 26 (3P)

Evaluation: This student showed no progress for three consecutive terms and only advanced one level by the end of the year. This indicates a significant and persistent barrier to learning that was not resolved by the methods that proved successful for the other students in Term 4. Ang requires immediate and targeted intervention.